NO
PROCESS
The Neurospicy Community — What members should know

No rules. No process.
No recourse.

The NeuroSpicy Community charges $29/month and promises safety for autistic and ADHD adults. What it doesn't promise — or provide — is any accountability when it removes you. At least five members have been banned without explanation, due process, or refund. This is the documented record.

5+
Known members banned
without due process
$0
Refunds issued
upon removal
0
Appeals process
in any version of the rules

What they promise.
What they built.

The NeuroSpicy Community's welcome letter tells new members: "You don't earn your place here by explaining your story, you don't earn it by being insightful, articulate, or emotionally tidy. You belong here because you recognize this feeling."

That is the promise. A safe, unconditional space for neurodivergent adults who have spent their lives being excluded without understanding why.

The Terms of Service tell a different story. Members can be removed at any time, for any reason, with no refund, no appeal, and no requirement to explain what was violated. The rules can change without member consent. Content shared in vulnerable moments belongs to the platform. Screenshots taken to document harm are themselves a bannable offense.

The community is operated by Sol Smith — known online as Professor Sol — and owned by Sebastian Knowles. In Sol's own words, written January 2025:

Sol Smith — email — January 2, 2025
"Sebastian owns the website and manages the backend of the community. He's not a psychology person or an autistic person or a mental health person. He's a business person. Basically, the website owner is protecting his investment and it has nothing to do with community building in the grassroots sense of the word."

This is a $29/month subscription service marketed to some of the most vulnerable adults online, run as an investment vehicle by someone Sol himself describes as a business person with no background in psychology, autism, or mental health.

The gap between what is promised and what is built is where people get hurt.

Rules that arrived
after the harm.

For the first several months of the NeuroSpicy Community's operation, there were no posted community rules. Members were removed during that period — including during active mental health crises — against standards that did not exist in writing.

When one removed member asked Sebastian Knowles directly what rule they had violated, his documented response was: "I'd say it's not specifically a rule... It's knowing that you had crossed the line."

Rules were eventually posted — in three separate locations, with an effective date of August 1, 2025. The seven rules visible on the community's Skool page read: Respectful communication. No Politics. No Harmful Content. Be positive. No self-promotion. Make an effort. No spam.

The longer Terms of Service document that governs membership and removal contains something the Skool rules page does not: detail. And that detail reveals exactly what is — and isn't — there.

What the Terms say about removal

"Violation of these Terms may result in temporary or permanent removal/ban from the Community."

"Termination of membership does not entitle you to a refund."

"Admins reserve the right to remove posts or comments that do not align with these standards, and repeated violations may result in loss of membership."

What the Terms do not contain — in any version, before or after August 2025 — is any of the following:

A requirement to warn a member before removing them
A requirement to tell a removed member which rule they violated
Any investigation process before acting on a complaint
Any appeals mechanism or right to respond
Any definition of what "harassment" means or how complaints are evaluated
Any trauma-informed consideration for how removals are communicated
Any refund provision regardless of circumstances

This is a community serving people with diagnosed anxiety, PTSD, depression, and rejection sensitive dysphoria — a condition where unexpected social exclusion can trigger severe psychological responses. The community's own welcome materials acknowledge this explicitly, describing members as people whose "nervous system has been on alert for a long time."

The removal process — a ban, no explanation, no warning, no appeal — is designed for a platform selling software subscriptions. Applied to this population, in this context, it causes harm. That is not speculation. It is documented.

Also in the Terms — on documentation

"To protect the privacy and trust of all members, screenshotting, recording, or sharing any member's posts, comments, images, or personal disclosures outside of this Community is strictly prohibited without the explicit written consent of the original poster. Violations may result in immediate removal."

The receipts on this site document the community's own administrative conduct — not member disclosures. This site was built by someone who was there. The rule above is not a privacy protection. It is a documentation suppression tool.

At least five people.
The same playbook.

What follows is a record of documented removal incidents. One is named and fully documented. The others are anonymized at the request of those involved, pending their decision to come forward publicly. All are known to the author of this site.

The pattern across every incident: no warning, no explanation of what was violated, no opportunity to respond, no refund, no process. In several cases, the removed member was actively contributing to the community at the time of removal.

Incident 01 — December 2024 — Fully documented

Removed during a mental health crisis. Over the holidays. Against no written rules.

Josh Wolf — journalist, AI developer, autistic adult — was removed by Sebastian Knowles on December 29, 2024, while in an active mental health crisis he had disclosed to the community. The community was his sole source of support that week. Sol Smith was not consulted before the removal. No community rules existed at the time. When Josh asked what rule he had violated, Sebastian's response: "It's not specifically a rule... It's knowing that you had crossed the line." Josh was reinstated after three days. Sebastian promised that rules and a removal process would be established before any future removals. They were not.

Incident 02 — June 2025 — Fully documented

Removed while actively coordinating facilitation. Accused of harassment. No specifics provided.

Josh Wolf was removed a second time on June 16, 2025 — five days after exchanging messages with Sol about coordinating session facilitation together. Sol's removal message cited "complaints from other members" and stated he "doesn't know the specifics." A cease-and-desist followed on June 27 accusing Josh of harassing two named community members. Both continued offering Josh support after his removal. Neither reported feeling harassed. No investigation of the complaints was conducted or disclosed. No rules had been posted despite the promise made in December 2024.

Incident 03 — Date withheld — Anonymized

Long-term member. Removed without warning or explanation.

A member who had participated in the community for an extended period was removed without prior warning, without being told which rule they had violated, and without any opportunity to respond to or understand the decision. No refund was issued. This person is known to the author of this site and has chosen to remain anonymous pending a decision about coming forward publicly.

Incident 04 — Date withheld — Anonymized

Removed following a conflict with another member. No mediation offered.

A member experienced a conflict with another community member. Rather than any mediation, investigation, or process, the removal was immediate and unilateral. The removed member was not informed of who complained, what was alleged, or what the outcome of any review process was — because no review process exists. This person is known to the author of this site.

Incident 05+ — Ongoing — Partially documented

Additional removals. Additional people. Same pattern.

Additional removals beyond those documented above are known to the author of this site. The number of people removed since the community launched in mid-2024 is unknown — the community does not disclose this information. If you were removed from the NeuroSpicy Community and would like to share your experience, contact contact@neurospicycommunity.org. Your identity will be protected unless you choose otherwise.

On March 3, 2026, Sol Smith sent an email to eight named community group leaders with the subject line "Zoom Room Changes." The stated purpose was to update Zoom links. The actual content:

"There is a member who has been banned — twice — and has shown up again under a pseudonym. He's not a stable person and I don't want to be responsible for his presence, quite honestly. He's clever and persistent, but also can't help but make his presence obvious."

— Sol Smith, email to group leaders, March 3, 2026

This email — sent to people who had existing relationships with the removed member, characterizing him without evidence, without process, and without any opportunity to respond — is the community's removal process at its most complete. Ban. Defame. Lock the doors.

NeuroSpicy Refugees.
Here's what
we do differently.

NeuroSpicy Refugees
FreeNo subscription. No paywall. Belonging is not a product.
Posted community agreementRules exist before decisions. You know what's expected before you can be asked to leave.
Co-stewardship modelJosh and Joy co-steward with equal standing. A third steward is being recruited. No unchecked power.
Built for the people in itNot dependent on any founder's goodwill, finances, or business partnership.
Peer-led, honestlyThe people facilitating are the people living it. No clinical authority claimed. No coaching upsell.
NeuroSpicy Community
$29/month, no refundsRemoved without refund. Money kept regardless of how or why.
No due processNo warning required. No explanation required. No appeal possible.
Rules posted after removalsFirst removals happened against unwritten standards. August 2025 rules still contain no appeals or investigation process.
Business operation"Protecting an investment." Sol's words. Not community building in the grassroots sense.
No clinical licensureMarkets "expert-led coaching" for trauma. No licensed clinicians on staff.

Ready for the real thing?

Free. Peer-led. Governed transparently.

Join NeuroSpicy Refugees →

The receipts.
Every claim sourced.

Every claim on this site is backed by documentation in the author's possession. Green = confirmed document in hand. Gold = gap, seeking corroboration.

✓ Email — Jan 2, 2025

"He's a business person"

Sol's email stating Sebastian "is not a psychology person or an autistic person or a mental health person" and the operation "has nothing to do with community building in the grassroots sense of the word."

✓ Skool DMs — Dec 29–31, 2024

First removal: "not specifically a rule"

Sebastian apologizes for the "hash ban," admits "it's not specifically a rule... it's knowing that you had crossed the line." Says he's "still learning how banning works."

✓ Skool DMs — Jan 1, 2025

Rules "in the works" — never delivered

Upon reinstatement, Josh asks where rules are posted. Sebastian: "just waiting for Sol's approval — they are in the works." Never posted before the next removal.

✓ Email — Jun 19, 2024

Sol acknowledges prior partnership

"I'm a difficult person to work with, and I apologize that the idea of a community didn't work out through a partnership between us."

✓ Skool DMs — Apr 18, 2025

Sebastian recruits Josh — 4 months after banning him

"There seems to be increasing interest in having a Discord Server. I thought it's worth bringing the topic up again as you showed interest in building/running one."

✓ Email — Mar 25, 2025

Sol invites Josh to lead sessions

"I'm thinking of opening another zoom account, let you run the groups you'd like." Sol notes he's "been avoiding" Sebastian. Removal comes weeks later.

✓ Skool DMs — Jun 11 & 16, 2025

Coordinating Tuesday. Removed Saturday.

Josh and Sol planning facilitation June 11. Removed June 16. Sol cites unspecified complaints — admits in the same message he "doesn't know the specifics."

✓ Email — Jun 27, 2025

Cease-and-desist with fabricated harassment claims

Sol accuses Josh of harassing Monica and Rebecca. Both continue supporting Josh after removal. Neither reports feeling harassed. No investigation disclosed.

✓ Email — Mar 3, 2026

"He's not a stable person" — sent to 8 leaders

Sent to Krista Baumgarten, Jill Nachtigall, David James, Monica Garty Juice, Sam Moore, Cyrilla Baer Pond, RC Sadoff, and Sebastian Knowles. Full header confirmed.

✓ Reddit — r/AutisticWithADHD

BetterSol: credential question deflected

Thread: "Sol Smith is not a professor, why are people so uncritical?" Sol responds: "I'm the most educated, most experienced AuDHD coach in the field." Never addresses the substance.

✓ Email signatures + Community docs

Rules posted August 1, 2025 — after removals

Seven-item Skool rules page plus full Terms of Service. Effective August 1, 2025. No appeals process. No investigation requirement. No warning requirement in any version.

⚠ Gap — Seeking corroboration

Additional removed members

More than five removals are known to the author. If you were removed without process: contact@neurospicycommunity.org. Your identity will be protected.